"Change the sacred ideal of heterosexual marriage"

How does homosexual marriage change the "sacred ideal" of heterosexual marriage? Straights will still get married, have kids and form families. Nothing will change and you get to see the gays you hate so much finally shut up about marriage.

By the way, I looked it up. Look at article 16.

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml

Gays have every right to marry.

Marriage is intended to be a sacred bond between a man and a women as god made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. So ya it would be changing that sacred idea and that states that they have right to marriage, I don't even think you should call it marriage of its not a man and a woman so I don't see how it helps you.

http://i.word.com/idictionary/marriage

I should be glad I'm a mod, otherwise I would have nothing to filter myself from how much I hate your post.


Your sacred book is not a universal truth for everyone so stop acting like it is.

They are treated as 2 separate definitions: marriage and same sex marriage.


I really wanna hear what you have to say. I think cit should let you tell me how you really feel about my post.

Sadly the word filter would probably cancel out a good 80% of the post.

Yes that's an entirely reliable source.

Official definitions almost never change, but the world is changing all the time.

But now I see that the reason you don't want gays to get married is because of your religion. In everybody's best interest, I'm ending this conversation. Have a nice day.


@Jax I implore you to close this thread before I lose the ability to stop myself from doing what you wish to do so much.

They want to get married because they literally don't receive the same rights married people do. Also, my sister is a lesbian and has been so ever since she could talk basically, when she gave her Pre-K teacher flowers on Valentine's Day ;D

So in her case it definitely couldn't be attention. She's not a manhater, she doesn't have a distaste for men, but she's always been a bit of a tomboy...

And your point about the monkeys was terrible XFD
It literally has nothing to do with you. Do you realize how much harder it is going to be for them to adopt children if they don't have legally married status?

Who cares if they turn out differently? That's like saying people who don't hold your ideals shouldn't be allowed to breed.

Also LOL at your bloodline, do you even know your genealogical history? Are you so noble as to be descended from them House of Windsor or one of the last lines of Charlemagne? Your whole argument is that it's not a religious matter but a moral one, but what good is that when you get your morals from a religion?

How hilarious.


Lol I guess you were there when it got invented huh? Also it hasn't been this way forever, many cultures have allowed gay marriage throughout history, and in Greek and Roman cultures pederasty was extremely common. As you know, America is the new Roman Empire so :P

Also some of the first laws created around barring homosexual marriage in Rome were because of Christianity, so yes it is very tied up in that.

If it's not a basic human right to get married, then I guess you won't mind when we take your right to get married away?

Lol what inbred logic

Ok, first off.

I don't know your sister, nor do I care for her well being for that matter. Now that we got that out the way. Did you even read anything of my that one logical post of mine? Or did you just do the obvious thing and skim through it?

And as for your "Bloodline" question, yes, I do know it. My descendants are from Eygpt and parts of Northern Russia. Although I am an African American, those are were my roots come from. But back to the topic at hand, no one spit in the face of their families because they wanted to be different.

I still yet to see any real logical reason why gays should be allowed to marry or have children of/from straight couples other than the whole Bandwagon bid going on in this topic.

My question is simple, "Why should they?"

Err because they want the kids and not enough people do?

It's called adoption dude. People don't always just go out and get surrogates and such. There are plenty of kids out there and plenty of gay couples who would take them, so why hassle them?

Also that bandwagon is older than Egypt, so yeah.

EDIT: FURTHERMORE, you continue to show just the kind of indifference you have to people simply because you don't know them. I mean, I care for your well being even though I don't know you, I wouldn't want someone taking away YOUR right to marry who you want.

I'm sorry to hear that. And you have a good day as well jak and you too jax.


Actually that's what it was intended to be but free will is our choice. So I see where you are coming from.


No need to become judge mental and start name calling. I understand that yes, some cultures in the past did accept it. But tell me, what happened to every single one of those cultures? You do realize that back in the day if you didn't follow those set laws, you were killed. That's how strongly they believed in them. It's against my religion and I don't think it should be instituted in America. That's my opinion I'm sorry most of you don't feel that way but my opinion's not gonna change because of what you believe. There, I've said my point and now I'm done with this thread it's frustrating me.