|
|
This economy can't take another war. Retaliating by destroying all of North Korea would be a pyrrhic victory.
No civil hurt btw O:
|
| |
|
|
Err war helps the economy lol, that's why we've been starting conflicts ever since World War 2. I'm not saying it's an appropriate solution or that it works anymore(We are bleeding resources in Iraq, total drain on economy) because selfish people are profiteering through the war like Halliburton (Which Dick Cheney used to run), who would literally run trucks off the road to collect insurance money from the government as private defense contractors.
The reason the war would be terrible is because like Malu said, MANY North Koreans do not want war, but they have such a corrupt government, they are brainwashing the people over there. They have internment camps for their OWN people, and what they do their own over there is insane.
|
|
|
countries dont want to ally they dont want war like america does north korea first did do nothing wrong except testing weapons but if america can do that why north korea not? america is only leader of his own country but rest of world he have nothing to say it not leader of the world
|
| |
|
|
Umm North Korea has been butchering, imprisoning and brain washing their people for decades. After the first test, which not only America but he entire civil WORLD condemned, they threatened America directly and have stated they WILL invade south Korea, and if they meet opposition they WILL just blow them up with A bombs.
Sometimes things are dirty. Sometimes kids who have been brainwashed (N. Korea) don't need to be the ones with their fingers on the button, and other kids should take that gun away from them before we all go hunting.
I don't care if it's not fair, it's around 100x safer for the world at large.
Also, thanks fellas for the edit, I still have to figure out how to combine quotes into one post >.<