|
|
|
A blessing in the Sky could be a CGI revamp maybe.
|
| |
|
|
Dragon Ball, I feel, is a series best left to hand-drawn animation. It would take the charm out of the series if it weren't flat. I'd rather not see it done with CGI because I don't feel it's the kind of series that would benefit from it, and it would eschew the series' unique art style.
Edit: It seems I missed this post...
|
|
|
Yeah, the last dragon ball live action movie wasn't that great either. It was very under funded, and has bad actors in it. If dragon ball wishes to entice a large audience it has to have the proper funding and effects. Without these realistic 3D effects I feel as though this is doomed just to be another generic unrealistic movie. I pray if they ever make a remake of the cell games in live action that they get a big whig director like steven spielberg or james cameron, and they get a big studio like universal or MGM or just anything better than what they had last time, and at least 250 million dollars worth of funds. I know if they do this a dragon ball would be awesome. I don't think this will be happening anytime soon.
|
| |
|
|
You don't need a big name director and a massive budget to make a good film. I'd honestly just hire someone who has a lot of experience in directing films with a lot of martial arts in them. Stephen Spielberg and James Cameron wouldn't be the sort of people for the job.
Also, do you have any idea how much $250 million is, even when involving movies? I'd give a Dragon Ball film maybe... $80~90 mil to make a good film. $110 tops. For instance, Transformers, which required a truckload of CGI to make a truck turn into a robot, had a budget of $150 million. Avatar, which was done
almost entirely in super realistic CGI cost $237 million to make. Dragon Ball wouldn't require nearly as much expense as either of these films, since large portions of it wouldn't need any CGI if done properly.
104
